| Chapter |
Page |
Erratum |
| 1 |
8 |
In the
last full paragraph, third line, "withinindividual"
should be hyphenated, to read "within-individual." |
| 3 |
53 |
In Table 3.2, in the
left column beneath the major heading, "Level-1 Model,"
there should be a sub-title, "Fixed Effects" |
| 4 |
94 |
In
Table 4.1, first column, under Fixed Effects, the second
sub-heading should read:
|
| 4 |
101 |
The wrong
symbols are used in the first two terms to the right of the equals
sign in Equation (4.10). It should read as follows:
|
| 4 |
114 |
The second full paragraph,
third sentence, states that the estimated value of parameter gamma11
"remains at 0.695" when, in fact, we are referring to
parameter gamma02. |
| 4 |
121 |
Reference to AIC should
be Akaike (1973), not (1974). |
| 4 |
124 |
In the two statements
of the general linear null hypothesis beneath the third equation,
the symbol "0" should be bolded, as follows:
|
| 4 |
126 |
Immediately beneath
the central equation, the results of the hypothesis test are reported
incorrectly. The text to the end of the paragraph should be replaced
with the following: "Conducting this test, we find that we
can reject the null hypothesis at the usual level of statistical
significance (chi-square=6.23, d.f.=1, p=.013). We conclude
that these average true change trajectories do not converge by
age-16. In other words, the alcohol consumption of children of
non-alcoholic parents with low CPEER does not catch up
to the alcohol consumption of children of non-alcoholic parents
with high CPEER." |
| 4 |
129 |
Entry in last row,
second column, concerning the homoscedasticity of the estimated
level-1 residuals should read "... suggests approximately
equal variability at ages 14, 15, and 16." |
| 4 |
135 |
The wrong
symbols are used for the level-2 residuals in Equation (4.21),
which should read:
|
| 5 |
176 |
In "Time-1 centering"
in the second bulleted expression in the middle of the page, both
places where variable UERATE appears with subscript "1,"
it should really have the the subscript "1i." |
| 5 |
187 |
There
is an error in the denominator of the second term to the right
of the equals sign in Equation (5.13a), which should
read:
|
| 6 |
196 |
Figure 6.2, lower
right hand panel, label on the lowest solid segment of the curve
prior to receipt of GED should read "Pre GED," not "Pr•
GED." |
| 6 |
199 |
In the second equation
from the bottom of the page, the second line should read:
|
| 6 |
203 |
In Table 6.2, in the
heading to column #3, the subscript on sigma-squared should be
epsilon, not t. |
| 6 |
230 |
Three lines from the
bottom of the page, the text should read "in equations 6.8
and 6.9a." |
| 7 |
246 |
In the estimation
of the partial correlation between initial status and rate of
change, the correlation coefficient should be -0.49, not 0.49.
The actual computation of the coefficient is correct. |
| 7 |
253 |
In Equation (7.13),
the variance of the composite residual at time-j that is the
subject of the equation should not have a "hat" over
it, as it represents a population parameter, and not an estimate.
Then, beneath the
next paragraph, where we substitute estimated values for the
population variance components into the two pieces of Equation
7.13, the substitution into the first piece is correct, but
perhaps would have been clearer if we had written it as -(-178.23/107.25)
rather than as (-178.23/-107.25). |
| 7 |
264 |
11 lines down from
the top of the page, the text should read "adoption of a
Toeplitz error structure." |
| 8 |
276 |
The subscript on the
eta construct in the last row of Equation (8.9) should
be 2i, and not 3i, as currently stated. |
| 9 |
320 |
Fourteen lines up
from the bottom of the page, the text should read " You are
most likely to encounter..." |
| 10 |
338 |
Last sentence in the
first full paragraph, after the hyphen, should read "half
the teachers stay for less than 6.6 years, the other half stay
longer." |
| 15 |
594 |
There is a typo in
the numerical value of the test statistic associated with the
test for AGE, in the line immediately following the lower
equation on the page for the Wald chi-square test statistic. This
line should read: "Conducting this test for AGE, we obtain
an observed test statistic of 1.23." |
| Notes |
609 |
Footnote 3 of Chapter
8 should begin "Taking expectations in equation 8.14 and
..." |
